You want a pardox? Ok.

Libertarians (like me) are justly described as trying to maximize Liberty, and less correctly, as trying to minimize the restraints on human behavior. i say less correctly, because there is a sense in which the Libertarian actually believes in restraints nobody else believes in. If you ask a Libertarian and a non-Libertarian “What do you think about one person punching, injuring, or killing another, without the victim’s consent?” the Libertarian answers, obviously, “That is immoral.” And the man in the mainstream answers, “That is immoral…unless the perpetrator is an agent of a government, and the victim is a mere citizen.” Continue reading

Distributism part 2

I missed a thing or two in my last post about Distributism, in order to conclude on a hard hit. I’ll sum the whole issue up in a few words, even though in my experience that’s the least effective way to make yourself clear; I have no idea why, since most of the time I wish long explanations were so condensed. To each his own, I suppose. Here’s the few words: The efficiency advantages of the giant corporations, and thus, their “natural” place in the market, is a false generalization. The reason for this is that the actual production methods that benefit from scale are relatively few, compared to those which only benefit from scale through regulatory and tax advantages. As a consequence, many, many huge organizations are really wasteful superstructure attached to a relatively small core of productive activity.

We are familiar to the comparisons between Distributist production and Capitalist production; the dozens of workshops versus the singular factory, the kitchen of every home versus the commercial kitchen, the five hundred farms of three acres each versus the single farm of fifteen hundred. But what if these aren’t the things we should be comparing? When we compare workshops and factories, we are not, almost by definition, comparing complete enterprises. We are comparing the productive cores of two enterprises, which is a very different thing when you consider the resources which are consumed in the other activities of the firm that owns that factory. Narrowing one’s focus to look exclusively at one of GM’s factories is to look exclusively at the most efficient part of the operation, and to disregard major forms of inefficiency, even those inherent even to the factory itself. Continue reading

Advice I wish I had gotten…and followed


Build it for the long term. Employ your power of choice and action in increasing that same power of choice and action. Accumulate to yourself skill, virtue, and property, not with the aim of satisfying your desires, but with the aim of empowering yourself to satisfy any present or future desires you may have. You are going to know more in the future; the wisest thing you can do in your youthful ignorance is insure that when you are armed with knowledge, you are also armed with other things.

Everybody goes through a period where the prevailing condition of their mind is not right nor left nor this nor that but “uncertain.” We can very easily imagine the sage saying to his student, “Before I was enlightened, I believed such and so, and before that I believed so and such and wanted this and that, and before that it was this and that…and before that I didn’t know how to believe or want anything. And before that, I just wanted some chicken nuggets.” After childhood, one adopts a system of priorities and values. But if one is to have a system of priorities and values properly his own, he must learn both to create these things, and to love what he has created. And neither of these are a smaller project than learning to walk. The more seriously independent the mind of the adult is to be, the more strongly its tower of solitude must be built. And building a strong tower is a project that takes years; that is, it is a project that remains unfinished for years. This is what I did not understand when I was seventeen.

In the darkness of that time, I cast about for the proper goal to pursue, whether it was to be the life of monasticism or hedonism, of intense involvement in the world’s achievements or ruthless rejection of them. That was not a mistake; one must feel his way through the dark, in an especially necessary form of the word “must”. What was a mistake was to rip up all my progress in one direction every time I changed direction, and even worse, to not advance at all during the periods of total lostness. I should have considered that there is no goal that would not benefit from self-discipline, no course my life could take that would not benefit from enhanced practical skills, no possible outcome where I would be glad  for what I had not learned. Doing hard work is always of benefit; if you don’t know what to do, do the hard thing. When I at last cleared that mental fog, finally knowing how I should act and what goals I was to pursue, then I was glad not for the searching I had done, I was glad for the tools of action I had accumulated during that period. I was glad for the power of purposeful choice I had accumulated before I had a purpose. And in retrospect, I wish I had known to spend every day of my ignorance sharpening my axe in preparation for the day I would find a place to swing it.

Build up your power. Gain the ability to do. Don’t try to educate yourself for the purpose of getting “in.” Don’t even educate yourself to find things out. Educate yourself as you would arm yourself: As preparation with equipment for the unknown. The “Why” is elusive; learn the “How.” Equip your mind with knowledge and skill, whatever you can do, it is an activity which is actually impossible to regret.

You will never be sorry for knowing how to do something.
You will never find out what you’re good at without finding out you’re bad at a lot of things.
And the harder is to learn something, the fewer people are going to put the effort in to become good at it.
Conclusion: You become exceptional, and exceptionally needed, by making very serious attempts at mastery of skills without certainty of your aptitude in them, or of their value.

The wise Dr. Gary North refers to our calling as the most important thing we can do, at which we would be most difficult to replace.

He’s right. He’s right about everything. This entire speech is advice I wish I had had, and followed. I watch this video every couple of months, but I think I’d be out of line expecting anybody else to watch it, unless that person is an Austrian scholar with a long attention span and an affinity for the topic. A friend of mine calls this “Father Death, preaching at the pulpit.”

My point is that our calling is a thing we can do, not a thing we could do; our power of action must be expanded sufficiently to include that activity (and probably a lot of others) for us to ever say, “I have found my calling.” And there are three things that empower a person to do more than they otherwise could: Skill, virtue, and property. These and these alone are the vectors of legitimate power.

What do I mean when I say that property is a necessary element of human choice? I mean the other side of what Marxists constantly cry about; how the Capitalist factory owner has the power of property and is therefore in a negotiating position far above that of the individual worker. It is so, assuming (as they do) that the worker is a landless tenant, incapable of engaging in the slightest productive activity without submitting to the Capitalist’s employment agreement and the landlord’s rental agreement. But there is nothing natural about this individual economic helplessness; it is not a necessity of history that a man seeking employment seeks it as an alternative to outright starvation and homelessness. The habit of the modern consumer is to consume luxury rather than security; to mortgage a $300,000.00 house for thirty years for payments that could make a rougher place his forever. As knowledge equips the mind to overcome error, so property (of the right kind) equips the body to overcome want. To overcome these entanglements is an inevitably worthwhile pursuit.

What do I mean when I say virtue is a well of power? I mean that Lincoln endured through the furnace of his trials because of his character; he was a victor because he was as wise as he was, just as he was, upright as he was. Hitler shattered suddenly in the same furnace because he had not virtue, but its imitation: Pride. There is no quality of the heart that brings final victory except that which is alike to God; fortitude, courage, insight, ingenuity, justice, self-sacrifice, foresight, joy, faithfulness…One cannot build the B-29 without Godlike ingenuity, one cannot fly it without Godlike defiance of fear. A man overcomes only by being what God made him to be.

If you don’t know what to do, start readying as many tools of as many kinds as you can, in preparation for the day you do know. Because as soon as that day comes, you are absolutely going to be wishing you had done more of that.